Home Administrative Billing & Reimbursement BlueCard® Health and Wellness Medical PEAR portal Pharmacy Products Quality Management

Coordination of care improves member outcomes

July 24, 2018

Independence annually monitors the continuity and coordination of care that members receive to promote the appropriate diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up for medical care. Today, patients' health care needs are rarely met by a single professional. More often, it occurs through coordination and sharing of information by different providers.1

Continuity and coordination of medical care services is the facilitation – across transitions and settings of care – of patients getting the care or services they need and practitioners or providers getting the information they need to provide that care.

Care transitions refer to members moving between health care practitioners and across settings as their conditions and care needs change during the course of a chronic or acute illness. Settings of care are either inpatient (hospital, skilled care, extended care facility, or inpatient hospice) or outpatient (home health, emergency room visits, urgent care, physician office, etc.).2

Independence utilizes the following data sources to evaluate continuity and coordination of care:

  • Medical record review:
    • referrals to specialist and initial consultation notes
    • documentation of ongoing coordination of care from primary care physician (PCP) to specialist
    • documentation of ongoing coordination of care from specialist to PCP
  • Data from the Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set (HEDIS?)
    • comprehensive diabetes care: eye exam for retinopathy
  • Complex case management metrics for readmission rates
    • Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS) Survey
      • members who received care from a doctor or other health care provider besides their personal doctor (Commercial)
      • members who stated that their personal doctor seemed informed and up-to-date about care received from these doctors and other health providers (Commercial)
      • members who saw a specialist (Medicare Advantage)
      • members who stated that their personal doctor seemed informed and up-to-date about the care received by the specialist (Medicare Advantage)
    • Qualified Health Plan Enrollee Experience Survey (EES)
      • members who saw a specialist
      • members who stated that their personal doctor seemed informed and up-to-date about the care received by the specialist

    Methodology

    Data is collected and analyzed per product: Keystone Health Plan East (KHPE), Personal Choice? (PC), Federal Employee Program (FEP), KHPE Marketplace, PC Marketplace, Keystone 65 HMO (K65), and Personal Choice 65SM PPO (PC65). Where applicable, HEDIS, CAHPS, and EES benchmarks were utilized as the Plan goal.

    Medical record review: Independence utilized HEDIS criteria and framework to select a random sample. The sample is large enough to estimate plan-wide percentages with 95 percent confidence and 10 percent oversampling. The Plan goal for these indicators is 90 percent.

    Complex case management metrics: The following criteria were applied for calculating readmission rates:

    • all members enrolled in Complex Case Management between January 2016 and December 2016
    • baseline measurement period: January 2015 to December 2015
    • re-measurement period: January 2017 to December 2017

    The Plan goal for this indicator is a 10 percent improvement (or reduction) in readmission rates.

    Results

    Data review from medical record review demonstrates a gap with a PCP’s involvement with transitions and coordination of care. Although most Plans met the goal for consultation summaries in the medical record, documentation of physician review did not indicate that PCPs read the consultation notes. Results for coordination of care also reported gaps as documentation of ongoing coordination of care from specialist to PCP reported below 90 percent results for all products except PC65. In addition, documentation of ongoing coordination of care from PCP to specialist reported rates below 30 percent. 

    Overall results for readmission rates for members enrolled in Complex Case Management report that Marketplace and Medicare Advantage products exceeded the goal for improving readmission rates (62 percent and 16 percent respectively). Readmission rates for adult Commercial improved 8.0 percent pre- to post-period for 2017 but did not meet the goal. Readmission rates for FEP and Pediatrics demonstrated increased readmissions for 2017. Further review of FEP and Pediatric readmission rates identified that these results were being driven by only a few members within each plan with multiple readmissions, predominantly for cancer diagnoses.

    Review of CAHPS data reports mixed results. KHPE, FEP, and K65 met the CAHPS benchmarks, but PC and PC65 did not. EES rates for KHPE Marketplace met EES benchmark; EES rates for PC Marketplace did not.

    Independence acknowledges certain barriers that influence coordination of care, including, but not limited to, the following:

    • facility discharge practices;
    • access to electronic records utilized by different health care systems;
    • members not keeping health care providers informed of changes in care (e.g., hospital admissions, emergency or urgent care);
    • PCPs and specialists not informed of all providers involved in the member’s care (i.e., other specialists);
    • for members with multiple complex conditions, lack of identification of a PCP.

    Recommendations

    To achieve optimal outcomes for members, Independence expects practitioners to work with other health care providers to facilitate coordination of care. This can be accomplished through:

    • educating patients on the importance of collaboration in care and requesting consent to discuss medical and/or behavioral health care;
    • following up on referrals to specialty or behavioral health care;
    • communicating with other health care practitioners and documenting outcomes in the medical record;
    • obtaining access to electronic health records for other health care systems so you can review inpatient/outpatient information for patients who receive care at facilities outside of your network;
    • utilizing Plan resources for information and coordination of care.

    Resources

    Our goal is to assist providers in facilitating the coordination and collaboration of care to achieve optimal outcomes. Independence offers the following resources to network providers:

    • Clinical Practice Guidelines
    • NaviNet? web portal
    • HealthShare Exchange of Southeastern Pennsylvania, an independent nonprofit company
    • Care Management programs

    Providers are also encouraged to utilize the Clinician Collaboration Form, located on the Independence Worksheets, Forms, and Guides web page.

    1Gulliford, M., Naitani, S., Morgan, M. “What is ‘continuity of care’?” J Health Serv Res Policy. 2006 Oct;11(4):248-50. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17018200.

    2NCQA Standards 2018; QI 5

    HEDIS is a registered trademark of the National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA). Used with permission.

    NaviNet is a registered trademark of NaviNet, Inc., an independent company.


    This content was prepared for the Provider News Center and may not be reproduced in any way without the express written permission of Independence Blue Cross. Independence Blue Cross is an independent licensee of the Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association.
    Connect with us     Facebook     Twitter     Flickr     YouTube     Walk the Talk    Independence Pinterest    Independence LinkedIn    Independence Instagram Site Map        Anti-Fraud        Privacy Policy        Legal        Disclaimer
    © 2023 Independence Blue Cross.
    Independence Blue Cross is an independent licensee of the Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association, serving the health insurance needs of Philadelphia and southeastern Pennsylvania.